The Kashmir Dispute A Ticking Time Bomb For Global Peace.
The Kashmir Dispute: A Ticking Time Bomb for Global Peace
The Kashmir issue remains one of the oldest unresolved conflicts on the agenda of the United Nations. Born out of the blood-soaked partition of the Indian subcontinent in 1947, the state of Jammu and Kashmir—predominantly Muslim in population—was expected to join Pakistan, following the logic of the two-nation theory. However, on October 27, 1947, India violated this principle and forcefully occupied the region by landing its troops in Srinagar, claiming the Maharaja had acceded to India—a claim still debated and never validated through a plebiscite.
The matter was taken to the United Nations, which passed Resolution 47 in 1948, demanding a free and fair plebiscite under UN supervision to let the people of Kashmir decide their future. India accepted this resolution but, to this day, has failed to honor it.
Instead of resolving the issue peacefully, India has continued its policy of aggression and demographic manipulation. The most controversial move came on August 5, 2019, when India unilaterally revoked Article 370 and 35A of its Constitution, stripping Kashmir of its special status, in clear violation of international laws, UN resolutions, and bilateral agreements like the Shimla Agreement (1972) and the Lahore Declaration (1999).
This act of constitutional aggression has turned Kashmir into a military garrison, with thousands of troops deployed and severe restrictions imposed on the local population, including communication blackouts, curfews, arrests, and human rights violations documented by international watchdogs.
A Region on the Edge of Nuclear Catastrophe
India and Pakistan have already fought three full-scale wars—two of which were directly linked to Kashmir. Both nations are now nuclear-armed, and any escalation over Kashmir has the potential to spiral into a full-blown nuclear war. The world must not underestimate this threat.
Key Historical Highlights:
1. UN Resolutions (1948–1957): Repeatedly affirm Kashmiris’ right to self-determination.
2. Shimla Agreement (1972): Urged bilateral resolution but has seen little progress due to India’s intransigence.
3. International Silence: Global powers such as the US, UK, Russia, and China have prioritized economic and strategic interests over justice, turning a blind eye to Indian violations.
Possible Global Consequences:
• Regional Devastation: War between two nuclear states will endanger the entire South Asian region.
• Refugee Crisis: Millions may be displaced, triggering a humanitarian emergency.
• Economic Shockwaves: Global markets, trade routes, and security frameworks may collapse under the weight of war.
What Must Be Done?
1. The United Nations must enforce its resolutions and send a clear message against unilateral actions.
2. The Kashmiri people must be granted their democratic right to self-determination.
3. International pressure—diplomatic, economic, and moral—must be placed on India to reverse its actions and restore Kashmir’s autonomy.
4. The OIC, European Union, and global civil societies must actively participate in conflict resolution.
Conclusion:
The Kashmir conflict is no longer a regional issue—it is a global threat. The silence of the international community only emboldens oppression. History teaches us that people can be suppressed, but not silenced forever. If justice is delayed, peace will be denied. Kashmir is not a piece of land—it is a living wound on the conscience of the modern world.
Comments
Post a Comment