Pakistan, Israel and Palestine Lock Horns Over Justice and Survival

From UN Podium to Global Conscience; Pakistan, Israel and Palestine Lock Horns Over Justice and Survival

The marble halls of the United Nations echoed this week with words of war, hope and defiance. Three voices — Pakistan’s, Israel’s and Palestine’s — rose above the diplomatic din to set out irreconcilable visions of justice, statehood and survival.

Pakistan: A Voice for the Oppressed

Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif did not mince his words. From the rostrum he painted Gaza’s reality: bombed homes, dead children, starving families. He called Israel’s assault “rogue behaviour” and a defiance of every principle the UN claims to stand for.

He demanded what the UN has already promised — a sovereign, independent Palestine based on pre-1967 borders with Al-Quds al-Sharif (Jerusalem) as its capital. He urged an immediate ceasefire and unhindered humanitarian aid. And he went further still, questioning whether a state that “tramples resolutions daily” should keep its UN membership.

Pakistan’s message was unmistakable: international law is meaningless if it does not shield the vulnerable.

Israel: Survival Over Sympathy

In a starkly different tone, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu vowed to “finish the job” in Gaza. Israel’s war, he said, is not a choice but an existential necessity. To recognise a Palestinian state now, he warned, would be to “reward terror” and endanger every democracy battling extremism.

Israel, he insisted, commits no genocide; it acts in self-defence. It will not allow its citizens to be massacred or its capital divided. To drive the point home, his speech was reportedly broadcast over loudspeakers into Gaza as a form of psychological warfare.

Israel’s message was equally clear: security first, everything else second.

Palestine: Plea for Justice, End of Occupation

Speaking remotely after being denied a U.S. visa, President Mahmoud Abbas accused Israel of “war crimes” and “crimes against humanity”. He called for an immediate ceasefire, for the lifting of blockades and for serious negotiations on a two-state solution. He pledged that the Palestinian Authority — not Hamas — could govern Gaza after the war.

Abbas stressed that without East Jerusalem as capital and an end to settlement expansion, a viable Palestinian state is a mirage. His closing words were less a speech than an appeal: “Enough impunity, enough blood.”

The Collision of Narratives

At the UN, these three positions collided like tectonic plates:

• Jerusalem: For Pakistan and Palestine, it is the heart of a future state. For Israel, it is indivisible.

• Statehood: Most of the world now recognises Palestine; Israel calls such recognition “shameful capitulation.”

• Ceasefire vs. Security: Pakistan and Palestine demand an immediate halt to bombing; Israel says not until Hamas is destroyed.

The result is diplomatic deadlock even as lives are lost by the hour.

A Test for the United Nations

These speeches were not mere ritual. They were a stress-test of the UN’s own credibility. If decades of resolutions, principles and human-rights rhetoric cannot stop mass killing or open the road to a just peace, what is left of the post-war order?

Pakistan cast itself as the conscience of the Muslim world. Israel framed itself as the frontline of democracy under siege. Palestine pleaded for dignity and a home of its own.

The question now is not whose speech drew louder applause. It is whether the world has the courage to turn speeches into action — and whether justice can prevail before despair becomes permanent.